HOME | DD

ZurinaRose — The Philosphers Stone by-nc-nd

Published: 2011-10-11 18:27:24 +0000 UTC; Views: 956; Favourites: 24; Downloads: 3
Redirect to original
Description I've decided to upload this one with the typography on it instead of linking you to it and having just the image. This time its the turn of Harry Potter. I've always been super nervous about drawing Harry Potter as there is so much amazing artwork out there and i didn't really feel i could compete.....plus i've never drawn a Harry that i'm happy with. BUT i like this one!

Hope you do too

Done in watercolours

Harry Potter obviously belongs to J. K. Rowling

EDIT: I tried submitting this piece to an illustration group, and although i can understand some of their reasons for declining it, they said harry and ron looked undefined and drawn rather childishly. Does anyone else think so? I was rather happy with my Harry, for the first time ever really.
Related content
Comments: 12

janach [2011-11-05 15:45:29 +0000 UTC]

Regarding the criticism from the illo group: The boys' faces are certainly drawn very simply, the eyes in particular. But that's just a style. I'd call it "primitive" (in the artistic sense) rather than childish. Ron's eyes could use some work even if you keep the "primitive" style. They're different sizes and are looking in different directions.

As for the overall composition: I like the castle. Nicely abstract in the Scottish fog. The fuzzy gap between the two boys, however, seems to me a weakness. It looks like Hermione is supposed to be standing there. If you don't want to include her, I think the two figures should be somewhat larger and closer together, in order to lessen the gap. It's that foggy spot right in the center of of your composition that looks undefined to me, not Harry and Ron.

Final technical detail: "Philosopher's" needs an apostrophe.

Offered in the spirit of friendly helpfulness. You DID ask.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ZurinaRose In reply to janach [2011-11-05 19:41:32 +0000 UTC]

I did ask Thank you. I appreciate you giving a lengthened reason for the remark i mentioned. I would say its more primitive than childish too really, i guess that's more my style? I'd agree the eyes need work. I hadn't thought about the gap, perhaps if i put more detail into the castle, it would help with that problem as well as make the castle a bit more of the focus?

I always get the apostrophe thing wrong

Thank you for your feedback, it will definitely give me food for thought when i next paint. I tried something i hadn't done before and it didn't work out properly, but I'll get there and i definitely appreciate your help

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

solbeam [2011-11-05 12:52:08 +0000 UTC]

they look wonderful! i really like it

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ZurinaRose In reply to solbeam [2011-11-05 19:41:42 +0000 UTC]

Glad you do!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

moonlitseverus [2011-11-05 11:38:20 +0000 UTC]

Sweet!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ZurinaRose In reply to moonlitseverus [2011-11-05 19:41:46 +0000 UTC]

Thanks

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

DestinYDesigner [2011-10-12 02:34:04 +0000 UTC]

I feel sad looking at this!
beautiful and very emotional .-.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ZurinaRose In reply to DestinYDesigner [2011-10-12 19:05:58 +0000 UTC]

Aww why do you feel sad?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

DestinYDesigner In reply to ZurinaRose [2011-10-13 23:31:03 +0000 UTC]

because it reminds me of the beginning of everything!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ZurinaRose In reply to DestinYDesigner [2011-10-14 19:14:20 +0000 UTC]

Aw! lol

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

pepea [2011-10-11 18:28:29 +0000 UTC]

nice

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ZurinaRose In reply to pepea [2011-10-11 18:36:22 +0000 UTC]

Thanks

👍: 0 ⏩: 0