HOME | DD
Queen-KittyKat β 3D Pinkie Pie!?
#3d #mlp #pinkiepie
Published: 2019-08-23 20:23:37 +0000 UTC; Views: 18578; Favourites: 639; Downloads: 109
Redirect to original
Description
Aw yeh baby I still got it!
she's like "whuaaat is that me!?"
So, I used to draw kinda 3D ish, but I toned it down because people called it creepy and uncanny valley...those comments rlly upset me lol
but with this one I don't care. It is creepy and I know it ;D
I tried to fool the peeps over on instagram saying this was my first ever 3D model...
Related content
Comments: 48
π: 0 β©: 0
π: 0 β©: 0
π: 0 β©: 0
π: 1 β©: 0
π: 0 β©: 0
π: 0 β©: 0
π: 0 β©: 0
Was this ur rig, or someone elseβs. Β What program was this made in?
π: 0 β©: 0
Tbh the uncanny factor is what sells it for me lol your style is super unique!!
π: 1 β©: 1
This Deviation was featured in the following Equestria Daily Post www.equestriadaily.com/2019/09β¦ Thank you for providing pony material for all of us to enjoy 
(This bot is unofficial, it is NOT affiliated with Equestria Daily. If you do not wish to get these notifications anymore, please just block this account.)
π: 0 β©: 0
...this looks pretty good despite looking very silly.
π: 0 β©: 0
This kind of looks like Pinkie got merged with a latex squeeze toy but you did make it look almost photo-realistic.Β I love all the work you put into the hair, how it's just frizzy enough.Β
π: 0 β©: 0
That's kind of cool
it takes talent to do the shading on a 2d artwork
to make it look like a 3d render.
π: 0 β©: 0
She looks like she is visually designed for an angry birds movie.
π: 0 β©: 0
Yeah, this sure does look like a 3D model from far away. And her "Hello, Pinkie!" design is pretty creepy for me too.
Nice work!Β Β Β
π: 0 β©: 0
There is an upcoming 3d show of pinkie that the official MLP YouTube channel uploaded and it could mean G5 will be in 3d
π: 0 β©: 0
I feel it has nothing to do with the 3D style...
Heck, this Pinkie isn't creepy.
I even took the liberty of scrolling your gallery for anything remotely in the creepsters turf, and this was the only piece that struck me. Literally nothing else fit the category /shrug
π: 1 β©: 1
Wait, so your criteria on whether something looks 3D isn't that it appears to have depth but that it looks creepy?
π: 1 β©: 1
I think your ability to comprehend English needs some work...
I could take the time to explain, but if I wasn't clear enough the first time I doubt a second attempt will find more success.
π: 1 β©: 1
You barely even supported your stance, how am I the one that needs to further extrapolate my opinion?Β
You are the one conflating the Uncanny Valley, in which something that is close to looking human does not quite fit the bill and that causes a sense of unease, with something looking 3D. And all it takes to make something look 3D is adding form and depth through proper shading and lighting.
Most people usually sight something looking uncanny as a failure in design, not on how it's rendered.Β
You are the one confusing aesthetics with technique here. All I wanted was for you to further explain your stance, and instead you decide to throw me a petty insult. So unless you actually want to further expound on your thoughts on why the piece in question does not look like it is 3D, I think we are done here.Β
π: 0 β©: 2
I really admire 's 3D's work. I don't know what particular work's she is referring to. (I greatly admire all of them,and I don't think she should tone it down)Β
For me, Working in 3-d is a bit tricky. Because the Form/lighting, Anatomy/Proportions, and Personality/character all play a role towardsΒ
Uncanny valley or towards toonizing.( A great example is this, is of the Lion king deep fake ~ ( www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y1HGgIβ¦))
Alot of it is experimenting, and developing. But I wish the best onto whatever queen-kittykat decides.Β
π: 0 β©: 1
That's the thing. As far as digitally painted MLP ponies go, hers are probably some of the best I've seen. Like if someone didn't know any better they might actually think that they were 3d models. And they certainly aren't uncanny valley, because in order to be uncanny valley they would have to look human but not quite.
Oh boy, the Lion King remake. The funny thing is that Disney themselves made the Narnia films years ago and did a much better job with making Asland look more expressive and realistic. Because real animals' faces move. When I drop something and make a loud noise my dogs look worried. When angry they furrow their muzzle and brow. It's not even that they have to look exactly like the cartoon there it's that they look deadpan and stiff the whole time. And that just isn't how animal's faces work. That right there is a good example of something that's actually uncanny, because it's like you are looking at taxidermied animals in the remake.
Yeah same here, I hope she does what makes her happy and not bend the knee to people who put her down.
π: 0 β©: 0
Lot of words for a whole lot of nothing. Good day
π: 0 β©: 0
I'd say the body looks like a 3d model, but the soft painted hair gives away that it's 3d. Could fool some people though!Β
π: 0 β©: 0
Honestly, that 3dimensional shading was always something I adored in your work~
π: 0 β©: 1
Holy guacamole!!! /)0 Β o Β 0(\ How awesome!
π: 0 β©: 0
She's as supriced and cunfused as the rest of us
π: 0 β©: 0
I really hope this wasn't secretly a G5 preview
π: 0 β©: 0
what are they talking about "creepy" this is heccin adorable!!!
π: 0 β©: 0
Dang! I genuinely thought this was 3D as well! Not bad for your first time drawing 3D either! *wink wink nudge nudge*
π: 0 β©: 0
π: 0 β©: 1
thank you! well it's 100% 2D
It was surprizingly not that difficult for me, but it could be cuz of her simple design
π: 0 β©: 0
Hold on, this isn't a 3D model??? THIS IS A DRAWING???? WHAT?????????
π: 1 β©: 0
