HOME | DD

Oxidizing-Angel — Tempestuous

Published: 2010-03-11 22:23:24 +0000 UTC; Views: 1179; Favourites: 16; Downloads: 21
Redirect to original
Description Running outta words

Again not good quality, blurry. I don't know why cameras can't seem to see me.




[link]
Related content

Oxidizing-Angel - The Strangest Things

Oxidizing-Angel - They Said You Were the Wicked Kind

Oxidizing-Angel - I swear I'll tear you apart

Oxidizing-Angel - It's All for the Best

Oxidizing-Angel - If I Die

Oxidizing-Angel - I tried to do it all for you

Oxidizing-Angel - In Another Light

Oxidizing-Angel - Fire Disguised by Rain

Oxidizing-Angel - Soft with Sorrow

Samiii-chan - magic eyes

uzunogluahmet - red special

Delmera-Lyra - Black Red

debbieattwell - Addiction

Amy-Heartbreak - Hello

DarkVenusPersephonae - Coldblooded

seditliel - self portrait

huomennastock - expression stock 02

etoilehypnotic - Black makeup
Comments: 11

xCha0tic1x [2010-03-12 17:16:44 +0000 UTC]

I've seen pictures of you in sunlight, so you're not a vampire

I agree with scotchy1ca. Your eyes are incredible.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Oxidizing-Angel In reply to xCha0tic1x [2010-03-12 21:57:27 +0000 UTC]

Well the sunlight part of the vampire myth wasn't in the original folklore, it was added later when F.W. Murnau did Nosferatu that he completely ripped off from Bram Stoker. It was one of the few things he changed/added to avoid copyright infringement.

So I guess you never know

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

xCha0tic1x In reply to Oxidizing-Angel [2010-03-12 21:59:13 +0000 UTC]

Hmmmm, so do you have a reflection? Who originated that part of the folklore?

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

Oxidizing-Angel In reply to xCha0tic1x [2010-03-12 22:59:41 +0000 UTC]

*not sure

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Oxidizing-Angel In reply to xCha0tic1x [2010-03-12 22:58:40 +0000 UTC]

I think, but I'm sure because I haven't looked it up, it probably comes from when people thought that your reflection showed your soul. Since vampires are vile, despicable (not to mention undead which is most unholy) creatures, they were probably thought to not have souls.
No soul, no reflection.

But that's just my theory

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

xCha0tic1x In reply to Oxidizing-Angel [2010-03-12 23:34:08 +0000 UTC]

I think your explanation has merit. I'll buy that anyway

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Oxidizing-Angel In reply to xCha0tic1x [2010-03-14 06:24:00 +0000 UTC]

Either way, I am a creature of the night.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

xCha0tic1x In reply to Oxidizing-Angel [2010-03-14 14:03:59 +0000 UTC]

A creative creature

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Oxidizing-Angel In reply to xCha0tic1x [2010-03-14 21:54:50 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

scotchy1ca [2010-03-11 23:48:05 +0000 UTC]

Beautiful picture. Your eyes are absolutely breathtaking. I would try moving the camera back a bit, autofocus doesn't always work well at close distances. Then you can crop it later if you like. If you have multiple autofocus points set on your camera, switch it to center focus that way the camera will make more of an effort to focus on what is in the center of the frame. I like the softness of that picture but those eyes are too beautiful to be blurry.


Scott

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Oxidizing-Angel In reply to scotchy1ca [2010-03-12 21:52:35 +0000 UTC]

Thank you. I was losing light so I had to stay pretty close to the window but then it would focus on the background so I tried moving back to where it was focusing and then it would focus on where I was before. I don't know what the life expectancy for a camera typically is but I realized I've had mine for 6 years now and I'm noticing, despite the different settings I try, I'm not getting the same quality that I used to.
It also fell once, I got it fixed but ever since then the auto focus really hasn't been working well.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0