Comments: 8
ilovemy3cats [2015-01-18 08:02:38 +0000 UTC]
If lush can get in to Furry conventions I'm sure they would get an outstanding amount of support from the furry community
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Nozdurom [2013-05-23 09:05:04 +0000 UTC]
- Luckily, animal tested make up is not allowed or soon getting not allowed here in Norway. o v o
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Nozdurom In reply to LeafsStock [2013-06-12 13:49:53 +0000 UTC]
- Ah, then I wasn't completely wrong. c:
It's good that it have been banned, but how are there loop holes in it? :/
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
LeafsStock In reply to Nozdurom [2013-06-15 18:39:51 +0000 UTC]
There's a few different ones, i.e. if one ingredient inside a cosmetic product isn't tested on animals for cosmetic use but the same ingredient HAS been tested on animals for food allergies or medical research, it is still able to list it as "cruetly free".
Also, there's a time period it takes for companies to be able to say they are cruelty free, which at the moment is 5 years. So, say a company makes a new cosmetic product. They agree on what ingredients they want to use. They then test some or all ingredients on animals. From the moment they do the last test, they have to wait 5 years to say they are cruelty free (like, by exmaple, acquiring a BUAV leaping bunny logo on their product). BUT, if it takes this new product five years (after being tested on animals) to develop, produce, stock, advertise etc, then it could reach the shop floors under the pretence of being 'cruelty free' because it's been five years since they tested the ingredients. Does this make sense?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Nozdurom In reply to LeafsStock [2013-06-22 23:38:19 +0000 UTC]
- Yeah, that made sense. :/
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
MawiieCooper [2012-04-29 11:32:44 +0000 UTC]
I signed the petition ^^
I do my best to choose products that are no tested on animals (with the Peta list) but it changes very often, I don't know what to buy anymore
👍: 0 ⏩: 1