HOME | DD

doodler89 β€” avoid

Published: 2013-02-27 20:11:58 +0000 UTC; Views: 563; Favourites: 17; Downloads: 0
Redirect to original
Description acrylic on canvas

Related content
Comments: 27

GoldenKestrel [2013-07-14 00:01:15 +0000 UTC]

Good work. Perfect title.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

doodler89 In reply to GoldenKestrel [2013-07-14 19:12:11 +0000 UTC]

Thank you.^^

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

abouelse [2013-03-01 01:34:18 +0000 UTC]

Yes! The texture and color balance is perfect!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

doodler89 In reply to abouelse [2013-03-01 19:54:05 +0000 UTC]

Thank you.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

buckoe1 [2013-02-28 00:15:55 +0000 UTC]

Great detail...kind of a new style for you, I like it ^_^.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

doodler89 In reply to buckoe1 [2013-02-28 20:00:02 +0000 UTC]

Yeah, I feel like I'm always changing, I never really feel as if I have a style tbh.^^"

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

buckoe1 In reply to doodler89 [2013-02-28 20:15:24 +0000 UTC]

That's ok . Evolution is good. I like the detail and especially the fold in the hair, it looks great ^_^. The one this is I can tell when it's your work :3..that's good though, your signature dark and melancholy. You have a knack for that sense of the surreal

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

doodler89 In reply to buckoe1 [2013-03-01 20:08:14 +0000 UTC]

I think that I would just like to stick with one style for a little longer to really experiment with it and get the best out of it.^^ Thank you. That actually means more than I can make sense of, I would never has thought that having a style would bother me, perhaps taking in more art has done that to me.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

jsings [2013-02-27 22:25:03 +0000 UTC]

This looks cool! I love it!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

doodler89 In reply to jsings [2013-02-28 19:59:29 +0000 UTC]

Cheers!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

jsings In reply to doodler89 [2013-03-01 12:47:00 +0000 UTC]

You're welcome. (=

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

john-william [2013-02-27 20:23:12 +0000 UTC]

Subtle, I like it. Classic j-horror setting, no?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

doodler89 In reply to john-william [2013-02-28 19:59:13 +0000 UTC]

You know I actually thought the same when I finished it, kind of cool that it was unintentional. Frustrating that if I'd have tried it would have come out completely differently.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

john-william In reply to doodler89 [2013-02-28 23:15:48 +0000 UTC]

Never does, never does. That's why I've always a minimum of ten different projects at a time.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

doodler89 In reply to john-william [2013-03-01 20:09:01 +0000 UTC]

Well, I think that I must technically have hundreds, some that I started years and years ago, some that will probably never get finished.^^"

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 2

john-william In reply to doodler89 [2013-03-01 20:17:35 +0000 UTC]

You can't spell 'success' without 'chaos'! Oh, wait...

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

doodler89 In reply to john-william [2013-03-02 19:50:41 +0000 UTC]

Deja vou

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

john-william In reply to doodler89 [2013-03-01 20:16:56 +0000 UTC]

You can't spell 'success' without 'chaos'! Oh, wait...

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

doodler89 In reply to john-william [2013-03-02 19:50:19 +0000 UTC]

Weak, only two letters in common. Geeze, their are pretty much no words you that you can make with success.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

john-william In reply to doodler89 [2013-03-02 21:46:18 +0000 UTC]

The 'cess' in 'cesspool'? Sucks-ess?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

doodler89 In reply to john-william [2013-03-03 19:52:56 +0000 UTC]

Well yeah but...that's just part of a word. Huh, how did I not see that I wonder.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

john-william In reply to doodler89 [2013-03-03 21:22:58 +0000 UTC]

Blindfolded?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

doodler89 In reply to john-william [2013-03-04 19:48:32 +0000 UTC]

Those be the chances.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

john-william In reply to doodler89 [2013-03-04 21:01:40 +0000 UTC]

I must say, for a blindfolded person you type pretty darn well.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

doodler89 In reply to john-william [2013-03-05 19:34:00 +0000 UTC]

You're impressed by the typing? That's the easy part. Reading messages blinfolded, that's the tricky part.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

john-william In reply to doodler89 [2013-03-06 12:26:26 +0000 UTC]

TouchΓ©

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

doodler89 In reply to john-william [2013-03-06 19:32:07 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0