Comments: 29
mammukaz [2008-11-14 22:59:57 +0000 UTC]
I just have to express some emotions through different pictures and words. It means that I will put a couple of pictrues together and add some text there...
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
davespertine In reply to mammukaz [2008-11-15 01:15:07 +0000 UTC]
oh ok, it's fine with me, i am glad that you want to put words with my image. send me a link to what you do ok! ...
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
mammukaz [2008-11-08 18:32:35 +0000 UTC]
I really like this picture. Could I use it as part of my photoshop exercise if I say it's from you?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
absinthFenix [2008-08-22 13:28:33 +0000 UTC]
Good questions, and great shot.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
mybearjana [2008-08-14 02:13:20 +0000 UTC]
This is a lovely texture...I appreciate too that you have a very human depth of field for this capture.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
DeadStarKew [2008-07-10 10:19:53 +0000 UTC]
a square doesn't need the adjective "perfect"... but if it is "imperfect"... it does need this word.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
davespertine In reply to DeadStarKew [2008-07-10 10:35:27 +0000 UTC]
very logical reasoning and point well made, but it surely depends on context... all but theoretical squares are imperfect and different contexts prescribe different tolerances... two wrongs can't make two right angles
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
DeadStarKew In reply to davespertine [2008-07-10 10:39:03 +0000 UTC]
well said, though there are imperfect square that pretend to be perfect. That's why they are perfect in our minds.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
prototism [2008-07-08 01:20:38 +0000 UTC]
In my opinion, this is an epitome of abstract photography.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Sensitiva [2008-07-07 20:57:32 +0000 UTC]
perfection is shaped by an individual viewer. or not if viewer doesn't need one.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
davespertine In reply to Sensitiva [2008-07-08 13:02:12 +0000 UTC]
when most people find something perfect, time proves what they really meant is 'that will do for the moment, until i discover it's imperfections'
perfect in such cases is what we have never experienced or have lost... seems perfect or was perfect is more realistic
is perfect may be a term of pure optimist or dellusion.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Sensitiva In reply to davespertine [2008-07-08 13:45:34 +0000 UTC]
that's way i prefer to use 'beautiful' instead c:
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ill23 [2008-07-07 19:10:17 +0000 UTC]
there is just theoretical perfection...
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
davespertine In reply to ill23 [2008-07-08 13:15:39 +0000 UTC]
is it a perfect theory?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ill23 In reply to davespertine [2008-07-08 20:50:28 +0000 UTC]
yes, but it's a model with certain assumptions. so not able to transport the model into reality...
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
davespertine In reply to ill23 [2008-07-08 21:54:53 +0000 UTC]
that depends on which perfection model you use...
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ill23 In reply to davespertine [2008-07-09 08:56:07 +0000 UTC]
i can't think of a model where it is possible.
the world is not perfect, because of the untamable nature and the people within.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ill23 In reply to davespertine [2008-07-09 11:28:15 +0000 UTC]
ok i am in!
where i have to sign? ^^
👍: 0 ⏩: 0