Comments: 8
Aya-Wavedancer In reply to Robin-Heilschild [2017-10-09 08:15:25 +0000 UTC]
The Type 181 (Thing in the US) was actually developed as a vehicle for NATO. It was supposed to be an interim vehicle forNATO's "Europa Jeep" project that fell through. 50,000 of them were built for NATO countries, besides the civilian versions.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
RoadTripDog [2017-06-14 15:10:24 +0000 UTC]
As a writer/historian, I have an intense dislike for those who want to sanitize history or worse yet, deny that it happened despite overwhelming evidence. At least half of all history is ugly, stupid, ignorant, offensive, meanie-headed, disgusting, vile, revolting, nauseating, or scary, and it sure as hell was not politically correct. But it happened. We should study it and learn, not try to hide it or paint over it because someone decides that being offended is easier than learning what happened and why. Those who don't want to learn have the choice to look at something else, like cute kitten videos.
Historical fact: I like history and I like cute kitten videos, but then, I am an old curmudgeon.
Confucius say: Those who put their head in the sand should expect their butt to be kicked (maybe not an exact quote but I have a valid writers' license, and I'm still learning)
Road Trip Dog say: I worked for a VW dealer when The Thing came out. It may have been a fun Thing in some circumstances, but after a 50 mile drive in a Thing on a cold and rainy night I learned that it was not my Thing, but I would not prevent someone else from learning about it.
I enjoy your photography of historical machines. That's my story and I'm sticking to it.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
RoadTripDog In reply to Aya-Wavedancer [2017-06-15 20:02:16 +0000 UTC]
I certainly would not blame you for that. The history is there and I acknowledge its existence and would not try to sanitize it, but I would not choose to aggrandize it. Yes, slight difference, but that's my comfort level.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
DingoPatagonico [2017-06-10 15:07:41 +0000 UTC]
so coool
i want one XD
👍: 0 ⏩: 0