Comments: 27
Wulyte [2018-10-21 10:57:54 +0000 UTC]
I saw this same scene in one of my dreams before, I am astounded...
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
chbryson [2014-08-28 04:30:20 +0000 UTC]
amazing artist
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
xvigorx [2014-06-22 04:03:24 +0000 UTC]
I really like this one
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
black-cat16 [2011-06-14 18:21:23 +0000 UTC]
Fantastic perspective
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
AstroBoy1 In reply to black-cat16 [2011-06-15 01:29:02 +0000 UTC]
Greetings,
Thank you for your kind comments and for including my space art paintings in your favourites. Your own galleries are filled with wonderful images which I have included in my own favourites.
My best to you,
Michael C. Turner
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
AstroBoy1 In reply to R-tistiC [2008-11-16 22:45:18 +0000 UTC]
Greetings,
I understand why you feel this way however, I painted it intentinally with this effect . . . The small image here does not give an accurate feel as opposed to the actual large painting. I did crop the image a bit from an old photograph so this also may add to the effect you mention. . . If you have ever stood in the middle of a very tall group of trees or tall buildings and looked straight up you would have a similar feel and of course I did paint this as a "fish-eye" lens effect whcih is the only way you could actually caputre this in an actual photograph. Perhaps this helps you to understand the perspective and the reason for the focal point being near the top of the painting. I rarely place my focal points in the center . . . I do appreciate you taking the time to visit and your comments on my paintings . . .
Kind regards,
Michael C. Turner
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
AstroBoy1 In reply to R-tistiC [2008-11-19 01:53:47 +0000 UTC]
Greetings,
Yes, fully understand your point of view and I appreciate you giving me your honest commments. Thank you for visitng my Galactic Visions Space Art gallery.
Best regards,
Michael C. Turner
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
AstroBoy1 In reply to Chromattix [2008-10-17 22:28:20 +0000 UTC]
Thank you for your positive comments. I too have noticed this about traditional vs. digital space artists. Of course I am sure you know why digital space art is frequently limited to Earth-like spacescapes. Not that I am degrading digital space art for I have seen some, including your own, that is most outstanding, perhaps even superior to traditional art. I play around with digital from time to time however; it is usually just to help me visualize some ideas prior to committing them on canvas (one excellent advantage with digital). I sometimes revisit my older works using minor digital modifications. In all cases however, those modifications remain true to the traditional pigments and bristle brush techniques. One problem digital artists have is in protecting their creations as there are no "original" artifacts to prove ownership other than a digital signature if the artist considered activating the same. Traditional artists can usually command more for their art as most art collectors still love to have something they can hang on their walls or display on a stand. Even though digital art can now be displayed in many formats, especially with the more common use of advanced digital photo-frames, it still has its limitations. On the other hand, digital artists usually have less expense in creating an original work of art and frequently have a broader market considering this planet's current infatuation with anything digital or computerized. . . Nevertheless, I rather feel that traditional art will maintain a highly respected niche in the art world . . . I shall continue to watch for your new works of art and I trust you know that I consider your digital art to be extraordinary as it has the spirit of traditional art and your renderings are highly esthetic . . . your digital art never has the "picture in a can" look as does so much of the digital art I see in various venues. Take care and continue your great creations . . . .
Warm regards,
Michael C. Turner
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Chromattix In reply to AstroBoy1 [2008-10-18 12:19:17 +0000 UTC]
I agree. I used to do traditional art much more than digital up until I came here, Though I wouldn't say that all the digital work here "converted" me with it's dazzling colours and breathtaking realism...since I guess I was bound to make the change anyway, since for some reason, my passional for traditional painting seemed to die after a while...I was making slow progress. There was only one room in the house where I could get "messy" and that was the semi-outdoor sun-room, which was far too hot to work in when it was Summer, and too cold in Winter. It was also costing me more than I made in materials too Digital art also costs a lot too...But rather than buying lots of cheaper things regularly (like new paints, brushes, canvases etc) you need to buy things much less often, but when you do, it can sum up to half a years worth of paints, programs, computer upgrades and such cost hundreds, even thousands if you want the top of the line stuff. Right now, I want to get a digital Drawing tablet (the Wacom Cintiq) which makes digital art a lot like traditional, where you draw with a pen or "brush" shaped object on the screen itself, like painting on a canvas, rather than use a mouse (which CAN still be used for good stuff, it's all I've been using so far lol, but it gives major hand-cramps) and this tool is a fine example of how expensive digital art can be, since it's around $3000
Well, I have more to say, but better stop here....all this text is killing my computer (and hands)
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
AstroBoy1 In reply to Chromattix [2008-10-18 20:04:42 +0000 UTC]
Yes, you are indeed correct . . . the hardware and programs for creating digital art can be very expensive if you purchase the best, which is naturally what artists want . . . Although I have an older 16" Wacom tablet, I rarely use it and I find myself utilizing the mouse when I work in digital format. The tablet and stylus just never felt comfortable however, I suppose that is because I have used the mouse since its inception with so many other applications. You likely have not heard of the original Apple IIe computer which made its debut in the early 1980's . . . a rather primitive computer by today's standards. At the time I purchased the computer I also invested in a graphics program which consisted of a, then graphics intensive, 2D and 3D software graphics suite (an ancestor to Corel and Adobe) as well as an electronic stylus in which I could render directly on the screen or tablet. It was rather impressive at that time and, although it had limited dpi and required significant time to process the image when saved to a large floppy disk (data could only be stored externally) it did provide an acceptable, albeit simple, digital art platform. I was never overjoyed with its limited resolution and found it to be little better than an "Etch-O-Sketch toy whcih is another reason I remained with traditional art techniques The Wacom Cintiq would be a wise investment for you. It has excellent reviews. From what I understand, it is the closest digital art tool to creating traditional looking graphic aart yet developed . . . at least for its price range and availability. Although your work is superb now, I can only imagine what you would create with such an advanced digital too . . . I hope you obtain one soon however, I trust "good wittle two-shoes" shall be your mentor in doing so . . .
Warmest regards,
Michael C. Turner
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Chromattix In reply to AstroBoy1 [2008-10-19 01:21:55 +0000 UTC]
Nah, Havn't heard of that computer (I wasn't even around in the early 1980's ) and funny though, Our family has had a computer since 2000 I think, but we rarely touched it anymore than a collective total of a few hours each week (hooray for dial-up internet and bulky windows 95 models ) But once we got broadband internet (not long after I made an account here) our late-blooming family finally warmed up to technology and now we are quite dependant on the computer on a daily basis Though my Mother and stepdad still look at it like a monkey looks at a jack-in-the box...wondering what the hell this thing is supposed to do
I think I've ever only tried the pen and tablet once in my life, and even then, was only for a minute, but that was over 2 years ago where I was a little bit naive to trying new things. It wasn't the Cintiq though (the crappy school I went to couldn't afford anything like that anyway) It's true that some things are better left to the mouse, like 3D art and a few aspects of 2D digital art, I'll try and get as much use out of this Cintiq when I get it (which might not be till the end of the year) Especially on landscapes and character illustrations, but I sure wouldn't be tossing out the mouse though, I'll find that useful for some things
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
AstroBoy1 In reply to Chromattix [2008-10-19 22:54:32 +0000 UTC]
It seems you have certainly made up for lost time relative to art applications with computer technology. I am happy to hear that you shall likely get your Cintiq at least by the end of the year . . . Perhaps Father Christmas shall help make this a reality . . . Take care and keep creating those wonderful works of art . . .
My best,
Michael C. Turner
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
estal [2008-09-13 04:57:15 +0000 UTC]
damn... thats kick ass work.. nice job
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
AstroBoy1 In reply to estal [2008-09-15 02:29:48 +0000 UTC]
I am pleased you were inspired by my art. Please check my gallery from time to time as I shall be adding new images in the near future.
Best regards,
Michael C. Turner
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
pymse [2008-09-05 06:57:55 +0000 UTC]
admire the texture of the mountains and the composition
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
AstroBoy1 In reply to pymse [2008-09-05 21:13:28 +0000 UTC]
Greetings,
I greatly appreciate your positive comment about my art (Stellar Sanctuary). Please do check my gallery from time to time as I shall be adding more in the near future.
Kind regards,
Michael C. Turner
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
AstroBoy1 In reply to onesixone [2008-09-04 05:51:03 +0000 UTC]
Your positive comment is greatly appreciated. Please take a look at my gallery.
Best regards,
Michael C. Turner
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
AstroBoy1 In reply to KelpyKrad [2008-09-04 05:48:48 +0000 UTC]
Thank you. I hope you are inspired . . . Please check my gallery.
Kind regards,
Michael C. Turner
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
KelpyKrad In reply to AstroBoy1 [2008-09-04 05:49:42 +0000 UTC]
sure! I'll check it right now :3
👍: 0 ⏩: 0